Reviews
Opera News
November 2003
By Joshua Rosenblum
Two things must be said here: first, the technology is undeniably impressive. The computer program that runs the virtual orchestra contains digital samples of every orchestral instrument, with a variety of choices for articulation, dynamics and phrasing. In performance, the operator taps one key on a small keyboard in time to the conductorís beat, triggering changes in tempo and advancing from one pre-selected sound bank to the next in sequence. For this production, twenty-eight speakers were strewn across the otherwise spare, platformed stage, each dedicated to a single virtual ìinstrument,îin an effort to reproduce the physical soundscape of a real orchestra. Obviously, a huge amount of effort goes into the preparation.
Overlooked in the advance furor over real-versus-fake were the other unconventional elements of this Zauberfl–te. The director, Enrique Abdala, in a good-natured effort to elucidate confusing plot elements, gave the opera a spoofy, futuristic setting. The Queen of the Night murdered her husband during the overture, and Monostatos (now Chief of Security for planet Earth) and the Queen were presented as nefarious collaborators from the beginning. The rewritten scenes (spoken in English) contained such lines as ìWe must subject him to the cybernetic chambers of Isis and Osiris and alter his genetic makeup.î Ridiculous, yes, yet entertaining. In such a context, with sci-fi projections, silly space guns, day-glo wigs and three masked androids ambling jerkily around like female C-3POs, why not have computerized music? (The performance, by the way, was mostly well sung and winningly acted by a talented, intrepid young cast.) Still, the question remains: is a virtual orchestra a valid option for a small, cash-strapped opera company that wants options beyond four-handed piano arrangements? Opera Company of Brooklyn may have gotten away with it for this cyber-Fl–te...